data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/110dc/110dceb38a1506addb64aa87ab0873e239078c53" alt=""
The major drawback with this kind of analysis is that, the efficiency and homophily (strong ties) that exist between the faculty members outside of their citations could not be uncovered. While some members have low number of citations it however does not imply they are least hard working. Some members perform better in conference presentations while lagging in citations, therefore by imploring the citation graph it entails that these members could not be fully representedby theireffort and contribution to the society. With this proposed model; the underlying ties between faculty members is based on their areas of interestwhich has been an untamed domain. This will be analyzed against Butts' structural hole theory and see if it applies to academic institutions. Key questions to be answered are how these areas of interest have influenced fellow colleagues within their network and how it has earned them, if any, advantageous posts in institutions that have various members with different interests in one department. In an extended study the leadership strength of members in structural hole can also be determined.
By Nyasha F. Thusabantu | Dr. G Vadivu | Mr. L. Thusabantu" Implementing the Structural Hole Theory to Analyze Academic Networks in Tertiary Institutions"
Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-1 | Issue-5 , August 2017,
Paper URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd2361.pdf
Direct URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/artificial-intelligence/2361/implementing-the-structural-hole-theory-to-analyze-academic-networks-in-tertiary-institutions/nyasha-f-thusabantu
No comments:
Post a Comment